Cassandra vs MongoDB - What are the Differences?


In case you are trying to find a NoSQL database, you in all likelihood came across Cassandra and MongoDB. Still, these two popular NoSQL selections have lots much less commonplace than anticipated. Whilst contrasting database structures, it is usually inferred they share some similarities as well. Although they do exist, concerning Cassandra vs MongoDB, these similarities are confined. 

 

Most significantly, Cassandra and MongoDB are categorized as NoSQL databases. NoSQL (Not Only SQL) is a famous opportunity for traditional databases. Unlike the relational databases we know, NoSQL can save big amounts of data without requiring a logical class or schema.

 

Seeing that conventional databases weren’t capable of handling a whole lot of unstructured information in real-time, NoSQL databases took up the project using scaling horizontally.

 

As a consequence, Cassandra was released in 2008, as a NoSQL database. 12 months later, MongoDB Development Services was created.

 

In this tutorial, we explain the differences between Cassandra vs MongoDB.

Cassandra vs MongoDB: differences

Data Availability

One of the most famous differences between MongoDB Development Services and Cassandra is their method concerning data availability. This feature depends on the number of master slaves in a cluster.

 

MongoDB

MongoDB Development Company has a single master directing a couple of slave nodes. If the master node is going down, one of the slave nodes takes over its role. Even though the strategy of automatic failover does make certain healing, it could take a minute for the slave to take the master’s place. During this time, the database isn’t capable of responding to requests.

 

Cassandra

Cassandra, on the other hand, uses a distinct version. Rather than having one master node, it makes use of multiple masters inside a cluster. With more than one master present, there's no fear of any downtime. The redundant model guarantees excessive availability always.

Scalability

Scalability is a characteristic without delay related to the cluster version. consequently, Cassandra vs MongoDB has significant differences among their writing scalabilities.

 

MongoDB

Handiest the master node can write and take delivery of input. In the intervening time, the slave nodes are only used for reads. Thus, as MongoDB Development Services has a single master node, it's limited in phrases of writing scalability.

 

Cassandras

Having more than one master node will increase Cassandra's writing capabilities. It lets this database coordinate numerous writes at the same time, all coming from its masters. Consequently, the more master nodes there are in a cluster, the better the writing speed (scalability).

Data Model

Now, let’s examine the data version of those two NoSQL databases.

 

MongoDB

MongoDB’s data model is categorized as object and document-orientated. This means it may represent any type of item structures that can have residences or maybe be nested in more than one level.

 

Cassandra

In the case of Cassandra, there's a greater traditional version. Cassandra has a desk shape using rows and columns. Still, it is more flexible than relational databases since every row isn't required to have the same columns. Upon advent, these columns are assigned one of them to have Cassandra facts kinds, in the end relying greater on the data structure.

 

Hence in case you want a rich data model, MongoDB can be the best solution. Its unstructured architecture offers you greater flexibility and the opportunity to arrange items within the given hierarchy.

Query Language

Another distinguishing factor is whether or not you need a database that has query language support.

 

MongoDB

MongoDB uses queries dependent on JSON fragments and does no longer have any query language guide yet. In case you or your crew is using SQL, this will be something to get used to. But, it is straightforward and easy to manage.

 

Cassandra

Unlike MongoDB, Cassandra has its very own query language referred to as CQL (Cassandra SQL Language). Its syntax is just like SQL but still has some limitations. Essentially, the database has an exceptional way of storing and getting better records due to it being non-relational.

Wrapping Up

Many consider MongoDB Development Company to have an upper hand with regards to consistency requirements. Nonetheless, this could range depending on the utility. Also, you may need to manually configure Cassandra to satisfy the consistency requirements you set.

 

After studying this article, you might have a better know-how of the difference between Cassandra vs MongoDB. Ultimately, the selection between those two NoSQL databases will depend upon your desires and the model your application requires.

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MongoDB vs Firebase - Which is the Best Database for You in 2021?

Why Choose MongoDB Development Services for Your Web Application?

5 Things to Consider for MongoDB Deployment Preparation